Conflict in Hitler’s Reich: A Card Conquest System Game, henceforth referred to as Hitler’s Reich, is resolved much like the classic card game “War” – but with dice and event cards added in. The principal deck has four suits, but instead of Spades, Clubs, Diamonds and Hearts, the suits are Iron Crosses, Fasces, Soviet Russian Red Stars and American/British etc. White Stars. The first two suits plus a Double Agent (the “Joker”) make up the Axis deck. The other two suits plus a Double Agent make up the Allied deck. The cards range in value from 1 (the “Ace”) to 13 (the “King”). Players are dealt a number of cards from their deck equal to their economic power – which is referred to as “Hand Size.” The Axis begin the game with Eight Cards, the Allies with Six. In addition, the Axis initial draw is “seeded” with more of the higher ranking cards to show their initial advantage at the start of the game – which begins during the Spring of 1941, just before the Axis invaded the Balkans and Rommel went to North Africa.
In a battle (conflict) for territory or for an Event Card (such as Convoys, War Production, Jet Fighters etc.: which can increase their economies or add bonuses in military, diplomatic or economic conflict) each player places one card from his hand face down. After revealing the two cards, they then roll three dice and add the total to the value of the card they played. The three highest ranking cards (11-12-13) as indicated below, allow the player to re-roll one, two or all three of those dice. Cards 2-10 do not have any re-roll ability. Card 1 – the Saboteur (which corresponds to the “Ace” in a deck) has a special ability that reduces the opponent’s card value to a One – although the opponent would retain any re-rolls from a high card. The Double Agents (the Jokers in the deck) are worth 10, but require the other player forfeit any non-event card re-rolls. Double Agents always lose ties – and go to the opponent’s discard pile if they do.
In addition to their “War” card and dice, when resolving a battle on land or sea, players may also throw down Event Cards (which include Generals like Patton, Rommel, Montgomery and Chuikov, as well as weapons and tactics like Tiger Taniks, Allied Artillery, Stukas and Reserves, just to name a few). These may add a die, add a reroll or two, or allow a player to convert one of his dice to a “4” or “5,” or otherwise modify the dice and cards in the conflict. The Event Decks will be covered in a subsequent entry in InsideGMT.
To show the varying capabilities of the Axis, the Iron Crosses cards (i.e. the “Spades” of a Poker or Bridge deck) win ties to reflect the German Wehrmacht’s considerable capabilities; the Fasces (the “Clubs”) lose ties. Thus the Axis player has to make a decision not only about how strong a card to play, but whether to commit his better “German” cards or his weaker “Italian” Cards (which also represent the lesser Axis powers). The Allies also have two suits. When defending a territory marked with a Russian control symbol or block, or when attacking from a Russian territory, the Allies must play a card from the Red Star suit if they have one. No such restrictions apply when defending or attacking from a Western Allied territory. This subtly shows the comparative weakness of the Soviet Union, its reliance upon the West for aid, and helps mirror the ups and downs of the Eastern Front, where in one battle the Red Army would amass overwhelming forces, yet in another suffer catastrophic defeats. An Allied player whose only Red Star cards are weak has to think long and hard before launching an attack on the Eastern Front. Always playing your best and strongest card is not always the ideal move, as Hitler’s Reich is a battle of wits and bluff and sacrifice, where often drawing out the opponent’s best card to intentionally lose one battle might just win them the next – or the war.
Well Mark, attempting to get my head around this concept. Through the years I have purchased and played many of your Great creations. Will be heading to the P 500 and commit.
Be well
Thanks for pre-ordering on the p500, Gary. My design is a novel concept, built on an old foundation — the card game ‘war’ we played as kids, with a touch of stratego, with dice, and with event cards. NOT a card-driven game and NOT a card game – but a board game where cards are played and dice rolled to gain territory, increase (or decrease an enemy’s) resources, do diplomacy (iraqi revolt, franco join the axis, turkey enter the war, vichy go allied etc) and gain tech (V-2s, Mustangs, Tiger Tanks), recruit generals (Patton, Rommel) and lots more. The game is fun for newbies and grognards…at wbc, a 12-year old kid beat the pants off TWO of my old wargame buddies of the nap wars crowd, one of whom was a playtester for this game!
“at wbc, a 12-year old kid beat the pants off TWO of my old wargame buddies of the nap wars crowd, one of whom was a playtester for this game!”
Is that a good thing though? It makes me a concerned about the game. Was the playtester taking it easy on the kid for demo purposes or is the game really random that you just have a fair shot of winning no matter how familiar/skilled you are at the game? Or is the kid some sort of gaming magician and just picked it up super fast?
The teen was very very smart — and he picked up the game mostly just from watching the last few turns of the previous one between the two older gamers (one of them one of my playtesters). My playtester was probably going easy on him at start….but not for long; the young teen did have uncanny luck not only with dice but in playing the better card when he needed it, and in doing some good bluffs…where you go for a key territory or event card, but intentionally play a low card in hopes of drawing out the opposing player’s better cards, so that in your next play you have a better chance of winning…the young guy was good.
Thanks for the taking the time to answer my question.
I’m really looking forward to this game. Trying to bluff, out think, valuation, and similtanious card reveal are all some of my favorite things a game can have. I hope this one starts climbing the P500 faster 🙂
Thank you. Yes, there is a lot of bluffing in the game, a lot of deception and trying to outwit your opponent with your cards. It is also very difficult to count cards, as a player can always do a Mulligan (an action to which we give a much more martial-sounding title) to dump cards and draw new ones. I just sent Mark Simonitch a copy of the playtest map, so that he can do at least a mock-up for the p500 site (my map is very clear and functional, but i am not an artist, and mark s. is that and more, and has done wonderful work on maps for my other games with gmt….)