Posted on

Infernal Machine: The Inventor’s Vade Mecum (Nautica ed.) Part 13: On Outcomes and Their Legacy

by

by Ed Ostermeyer (Master Engineer – Grade 2)

Oh, there you are, my young Inventor friend.

 What brings you to this tavern, at this hour of the evening?

You are wondering if your fishboat idea will ultimately be successful.

You are also wondering if what you are building will perhaps “change the rules” of naval warfare, be the start of a new era in warship design and usher in a new era of “terrible-ness?”

You are also concerned about what the future will hold for you personally; correct?

“Hunley” dockside in Conch Creek near Breach Inlet South Carolina, preparing for a mission {Source: Friends of the Hunley}

Good questions.

Posted on

Solitaire TacOps: Ortona — Contact Contests Control

by

As discussed in the first part of this series, the framing for play in Solitaire TacOps: Ortona, both for standard scenarios and the open campaign, revolves around expanding allied control to clear the individual maps. In the last part of the series we saw this play out through an example using elements of the Loyal Edmonton Regiment to gain control of the first block on the Edge of Town map. While the playthrough visually showed and narratively told how this happened, some of the key mechanics involved were glossed over, specifically as it relates to the German opposition. In this article we will look at the game’s Contact markers, and how they dictate the behavior of the German forces to contest player control (see this article if you are interested in how the player actions work).

A quick note about the playtest art that I use for these articles. As designs move into the prototype and playtesting phase I tend to do the art myself with some level of detail that may seem complete. I do this to clarify the concepts that need to be captured by the art. This is so that I can visually communicate these concepts in a shorthand which is not reflective of what the final art will look like. Once we start moving toward final art we have lined up some wonderful historical consultants to ensure we get all of the details correct.

Posted on

Infernal Machine: The Inventor’s Vade Mecum (Nautica ed.) Part 12: “…Should you decide to accept it…!” – Missions and the Reason for Going

by

by Ed Ostermeyer (Master Engineer – Grade 2)

Hello, my young friend, it is good to see you once again.

I note that you have a bandage on your left arm. Is something amiss at your machine shop?

 I see, so your associate purchased a lower grade of bituminous coal for your forge.

And some of it, what is the word, “popped” onto you?

The bitumen in that kind of coal will do that if you are not careful.

Your associate was looking to cut costs, was he?

You’ve taken the necessary action?

Good. We’ll not talk of it further.

Posted on

Solitaire TacOps: Ortona — Edge of Town Part 1

by

In the previous installment of this series we talked about some of the influences that went into the framing of the Solitaire TacOps campaign system. This connects operational planning with tactical decision making. The impacts at both scales directly affect the player’s ability to win or lose the campaign. This article will use an actual play session to show how this plays out on a single map of the campaign.

Historically the first urban map was reached on the evening of December 20, 1943, 14 days into the campaign. Solitaire TacOps as a system is less about recreating that history, and more about giving players the historical conditions to make their own decisions. As such, in the open campaign a player can arrive at the edge of Ortona earlier or later depending upon their performance through the regional maps. Those prior decisions and the results from them will determine which formation will be the first to arrive, which itself can have a huge impact on the outcome.

The campaign map shows the position of the division’s formations with the presumed positions of the Germans. Here we can see the Three Rivers Tanks (TRT) are near Casa Berardi while the Calgary Tanks (CT) are closer to San Donato, both still some distance from the Loyal Edmonton Regiment (LER) that has made it to the Edge of Town.
Posted on

The Effect of Troop Quality in Illusions of Glory 

by

The second edition of Illusions of Glory: The Great War on the Eastern Front (“IoG”) is currently on the P-500 list. Links to prototype unit counters, player aid cards, mapboard, and playbook can be found on the IoG webpage. The following discussion includes rule references in parentheses. The rulebook can also be found on the IoG webpage. 

One big difference between IoG and the CDGs “Pursuit of Glory” or “Paths of Glory” is the operation of Troop Quality (“TQ”). This is a measure of combat effectiveness, as shown by the downward (negative) movement of Russian (“RU”), German (“GE”), Italian (“IT”), and Austro-Hungarian (“AH”) Troop Quality markers on the General Records Track. 

Posted on

How to Play with Each Major Congress of Vienna Game Power: Britain (2024 Edition)

by

Introduction by Congress of Vienna Assistant Designer & Editor, Fred Schachter: Game Designer Frank Esparrago here concludes his four parts “How to Play” treatise, one for each Congress of Vienna Major Power: France, Austria, Russia, and now Britain which readers and prospective players of the game will hopefully find edifying and enjoyable.

The goal of these expositions is to give CoV players, particularly “newbies”, insights as to how to exploit the advantages and defend against the weaknesses of each Major Power.  These articles are provided in recognition that our beloved hobby has so many titles to choose from that there’s little time to repeatedly play a given game to learn all the nuances not revealed by a rulebook.

When Frank or I host a Congress of Vienna game at a club meeting or convention, we’ll sometimes warn an inexperienced player not to do something which could impede an opportunity for success or result in potential grievous damage to that player’s pursuit of victory.  Well, Frank and I can’t be at your Congress of Vienna gaming table to provide that kind of advisory help… therefore, these articles are intended to be “the next best thing”.

For more regarding Congress of Vienna, with the referenced “Strategies” articles as well as pieces conveying Scenario Set-Ups, Optional Rules (such as the Tactical Battle Resolution Matrix and those not provided with the published game), after action reports, a compendium exploring all the game’s cards, designers notes for the Solitaire and Two Player games, as well as presentations of this fascinating Napoleonic era history in terms of the game, etc., see: GMT Games – Congress of Vienna

Incidentally, please note these “Strategies for” articles are based on a Congress of Vienna Standard Rules Full Campaign Game of potentially ten turns duration.

With that, take it away Frank!

Posted on

Solitaire TacOps: Ortona — The Campaign Game as a Roguelike OODA Loop

by

In the previous series of InsideGMT articles for Solitaire TacOps: Ortona, I shared some of the inspiration for the design, discussed the role scale, effectiveness and maneuver play in the game, the structure of play from turn to turn, and what differentiates it as a hex and counter game. This article introduces the next series which aims to provide insights on what it feels like to play the game at both scales, as facilitated by the campaign system. The design goal was quite simple – players should feel like they are making impactful command decisions, over the course of a full campaign.

Players begin the campaign in command of the Canadian First Infantry Division whose mission is. Historically it took the division 23 days to push the allied line, on the Adriatic coast of Italy, from south of the Moro River to the sea town of Ortona. The open campaign challenges players to achieve this objective in 25 days or less.

The campaign explores how essential operational management is to success. Two frameworks which have had a heavy influence on how the game orients players for the campaign, are roguelike videogames and the OODA loop. Roguelike games have an operational framework that contextualizes the tactical play. OODA loops are situated tactically to sustain operational effectiveness. They do not perfectly define the TacOps experience but what they share parallels what it feels like to play the system.

Posted on

 The National Will Death Spiral in Illusions of Glory

by

The second edition of Illusions of Glory: The Great War on the Eastern Front (“IoG”) is currently on the P-500 list. 

Links to prototype unit counters, player aid cards, mapboard, and playbook can be found on the IoG webpage. 

The following discussion includes rule references in parentheses. The rulebook can also be found on the IoG webpage. 

One big difference between IoG and the CDGs “Pursuit of Glory” or “Paths of Glory” is the operation of National Will (“NW”). This is a measure of popular support for the war effort, as shown by the upward (positive) or downward (negative) movement of Russian (“RU”), German (“GE”), and Austro-Hungarian (“AH”) National Will markers on the General Records Track. National Will is reduced by Victory Point (“VP”) space losses and by playing Event cards (23.2). 

Posted on

How to Play with Each Major Congress of Vienna Game Power: Russia (2024 Edition)

by

Introduction by Congress of Vienna Assistant Designer & Editor, Fred Schachter: Game Designer Frank Esparrago continues his InsideGMT exposition of CoV Major Power Strategy pieces, the last presented through a “Strategies for Austria” piece: How to Play with Each Major Congress of Vienna Game Power: Austria (2024 Edition) | Inside GMT blog . This link will bring you to other material regarding this fun and exciting GMT P-500 offering.

Please note this article, as its preceding France and Austria segments, presumes a four-player standard Congress of Vienna Full Campaign game without any Optional Historical Rules.

We believe it best to follow-up the Austria article with Russia since those two Congress of Vienna Major Powers are both simultaneously partners and rivals as only one player can win the game.  Consequently,  Russia and Austria are, to use a popular reference, “frenemies”. When should Russia actively partner with Austria versus taking a more cautious approach in seeking its own game victory? That’s an intriguing and  fascinating game play challenge Frank explores.

With that, take it away Frank!

Posted on

Congress of Vienna at Nov. 2024’s SDHistCon Gaming Convention

by

As mentioned in a prior InsideGMT post, Jon Carter, of CoV Transatlantic Team Playtest Team fame*, created a version of the game, from Terry Leeds’ graphic files, for bringing Congress of Vienna to SDHistCon in San Diego.  In recognition of a four-hour time limit per play session, Jon chose to present the three turn Desperate Times: The Campaign of France 1814 scenario.  For more regarding this scenario, with links to additional Congress of Vienna material, see: Congress of Vienna Scenario Set-Up Maps with Associated Historical Backgrounds | Inside GMT blog

Below is a copy of the email Jon provided Game Designer Frank Esparrago and Assistant Designer/Editor Fred Schachter, with some excellent photographs, of Congress of Vienna at SDHisCon.